Transportation Vendors Report Card

As part of the New York City Public Schools (NYCPS) ongoing efforts to provide more transparency and visibility for families and the public, we have developed the first iteration of the Transportation Vendor Report Card. This data highlights vendor performance, notes areas of improvement, and identifies corrective action efforts underway to address service issues.  This report card pertains exclusively to school bus vendors serving students in grades K-12. 

Overview

The Vendor Report Card provides a snapshot of school-age transportation vendor performance across several key areas, including route subscription, staffing capacity, fleet readiness, safety, compliance, and GPS-based driving behavior. Each section is designed to help families, the public, and NYC Public Schools better understand bus vendor performance and identify areas where vendors are meeting expectations or may require additional follow-up. This report applies to school-age transportation vendors only. Pre-K transportation vendors are not scored as part of this Vendor Report Card.

Methodology

The report uses vendor-level data to compare performance across key transportation areas for school-age transportation vendors. Where appropriate, metrics are normalized by operational volume, such as active routes or total route days, so that vendors of different sizes can be compared more consistently. Some measures, such as accidents, breakdowns, and violations, should not be interpreted in isolation. These metrics identify trends or areas for review but do not independently explain cause, severity, fault, or corrective history. Additional context, such as incident reason codes, investigation outcomes, fleet age, spare vehicle capacity, route conditions, and vendor-specific operational factors, should be reviewed where available.  For bus companies in "OPT Performance Review" status, failure to improve may lead to formal corrective action, up to and including contract termination.

Additional Measures

In addition to the accountability tool below, NYCPS has implemented a series of measures to include accountability and transparency including:
 
  • The New York School Bus App which allows families to track their school bus as it arrives and departs
  • Quicker help desk waits times allowing families to escalate issues immediately
  • SupportHub incident reporting for parents to report service issues and track resolution status without requiring a phone call

September 2025 - January 2026

Legend

  • OPT PR = OPT Performance Review
  • NI = Needs Improvement
  • ME = Meets Expectations
  • EE = Exceeds Expectations
  • N/A = Not Applicable
Bus Vendor NameBus Vendor CodeRoute SubscriptionDriver CapacityAttendant CapacityFleet CapacityFleet Vintage AverageBreakdown HistoryAccident HistoryViolation HistoryGPS Saftey Score
ALL AMERICAN SCHOOL BUS CORP.AMOPT PROPT PREEEEMESee ReportSee ReportNIME
ALL COUNTY BUS LLC (B2321)                        ELEEEEOPT PREEMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
ALLIED TRANSIT CORP.IENIOPT PROPT PREEMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
BOBBY`S BUS CO. INC.BBEEOPT PRN/AEEMESee ReportSee ReportNIME
BORO TRANSIT, INC.BOEEEEEEEEMESee ReportSee ReportNIME
CAREFULCL/KFEEEEEEEEMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
CHILDREN`S TRANS INC. (B2321)HEEEEEEEEEMESee ReportSee ReportNIOPT PR
CONSOLIDATED BUS TRANSIT, INC.CSEENIOPT PREEMESee ReportSee ReportNIME
DON THOMAS BUSES, INC. (B2321)GTEEEEEEEEMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
EMPIRE CHARTER SERVICE INCEQNIOPT PREEEEMESee ReportSee ReportNIME
EMPIRE STATE BUS CORP.EMEENIEENIMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
GRANDPA`S BUS CO. INC.GBEENIN/ANINISee ReportSee ReportMEME
HOYT TRANSPORTATION CORP.APEEEEEEEEMESee ReportSee ReportNIME
IC BUS INC.                                       IAEENIEENIMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
JOFAZ TRANSPORTATION INC.JZOPT PROPT PREEEEMESee ReportSee ReportNIME
L & M BUS CORP (A)LUOPT PROPT PROPT PREEMESee ReportSee ReportOPT PRME
LEESEL TRANSPORTATION CORP (B2192)LKNIEEEENIMESee ReportSee ReportOPT PRME
LITTLE LINDA BUS CO. INC.                         LLEEOPT PROPT PREEMESee ReportSee ReportEEME
LITTLE LISA BUS CO. INC.ILNIOPT PROPT PREEMESee ReportSee ReportOPT PRME
LITTLE RICHIE BUS SERVICELBNIOPT PROPT PREEMESee ReportSee ReportNIME
LOGAN BUS COMPANY INC.LGMENIEEEEMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
LOGAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMSLPEEEEN/ANIMESee ReportSee ReportNIME
LORINDA ENTERPRISES, LTD.LRNIEEEEEEMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
LORISSA BUS SERVICE INC.LSEEOPT PRN/ANIMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
MAR-CAN TRANSPORT CO. INC (B2192)MWEEEEEEEEMESee ReportSee ReportMEOPT PR
NYC SCHOOL BUS UMBRELLA SERVICESNTNIEEEEEEMESee ReportSee ReportOPT PRME
PHILLIP BUS CORP (B2192)FPEEOPT PREENIMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
PIONEERPT/PWEEOPT PREENIMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
PRIDE TRANSPORTATION (SCH AGE)PCOPT PROPT PROPT PREEMESee ReportSee ReportOPT PRME
QUALITY TRANSPORTATION CORP.QLNIOPT PRN/AEEMESee ReportSee ReportOPT PRME
SNT BUS INCNWEEOPT PRN/AEEMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
THIRD AVENUE TRANSIT, INCTHEENINIEEMESee ReportSee ReportOPT PROPT PR
THOMAS BUSES, INC. (B2321)HTEEOPT PREEEEMESee ReportSee ReportMEME
VAN TRANS LLC (B2192)VNEEEEEEEEMESee ReportSee ReportNIME
VINNY`S BUS SERVICES (B2321)                      VSNIEEEEEEMESee ReportSee ReportMEOPT PR
Y & M TRANSIT CORP (B2192)YMOPT PROPT PREEOPT PRMESee ReportSee ReportOPT PRME

Transportation Vendors Report Card

Data Dictionary

FieldDefinitionScoring Logic
Overall Level/ StandingScore assigned to each metric based on the approved rubric; may display on report as "Standing"OPT Performance Review;
Needs Improvement;
Meets Expectations;
Exceeds Expectations
DefinitionPerformance category (report) tied to the overall level/standingDescribes the overall standing assigned to each metric/report
Route SubscriptionAggregate percentage of active AM/PM trips subscribed to in the Driver AppOPT Performance Review: <85%;
Needs Improvement: 85%–89%;
Meets Expectations: 90%;
Exceeds Expectations: >90%
Driver CapacityPercentage of a vendor's certified driver capacityOPT Performance Review: <100%;
Needs Improvement: 100%–103%;
Meets Expectations: 104%;
Exceeds Expectations: >104%
Attendant CapacityPercentage of a vendor's certified attendant capacityOPT Performance Review: <100%;
Needs Improvement: 100%–103%;
Meets Expectations: 104%;
Exceeds Expectations: >104%
Fleet CapacityPercentage of a vendor's vehicle capacityOPT Performance Review: <100%;
Needs Improvement: 100%–109%;
Meets Expectations: 110%;
Exceeds Expectations: >110%
Fleet Vintage AverageAverage age of active in-service vehicles a vendor hasOPT Performance Review: >12.5 years;
Needs Improvement: 12.0–12.4 years;
Meets Expectations: <12 years;
Exceeds Expectations: N/A
Breakdown HistoryRate of vehicle breakdowns normalized to service volumeNo scoring logic applied
Accident HistoryCount of accidents the vendor had during the timeframeNo scoring logic applied
Violation HistoryPercentage of violations assessed per route dayOPT Performance Review: >1%;
Needs Improvement: 0.5%–0.9%;
Meets Expectations: >0.1%–<0.4%;
Exceeds Expectations: 0%
GPS Safety ScoreVendor's GPS safety score based on driving behavior and GPS safety indicatorsOPT Performance Review: 0–89;
Needs Improvement: N/A;
Meets Expectations: 90–100;
Exceeds Expectations: N/A

Explanation of Terms

Overall Level/ Standing: Score assigned to each metric based on the approved rubric; may display on report as "Standing"

  • The overall number of students requiring busing has increased dramatically over the past three years, particularly for students with IEPs requiring busing, students residing in temporary housing, and students placed in foster care.  These students receive service on "curb-to-school" (CTS) routes that pick them up at the nearest curb to their home and transport them to school.  For the first day of school in September 2023, we had 5,627 CTS routes that served a total of 58,741 students.  As of 5/4/2026, there are 6,260 CTS routes serving a total of 69,621 students.  This represents an 11.25% increase in routes and an 18.52% increase in students in the last three years alone.  
  • The demand from some of our most vulnerable students is rising sharply as well: students in temporary housing and foster care relying on yellow bus service have grown from 4,936 students in school year 2022-2023 to 6,705 in school year 2024-2025 an increase of approximately 36%.  
  • As of 5/19/2026, 224 CTS routes with 1322 students assigned to them are without drivers.  These students have been provided with pre-paid rideshare while we await the hiring of more school bus drivers. Our bus companies have been engaged in aggressive bus driver recruiting efforts.   We look forward to further collaboration with our bus companies to devise recruiting strategies that meet the needs of our students.  
  • The number of stop-to-school students, eligible for busing through grade and distance from home to school, using busing has remained relatively stable with ~2130 routes serving ~70,000 students.   

Attendant Capacity: Percentage of a vendor's certified attendant capacity. This report provides a snapshot of attendant staffing coverage relative to active school-age routes for each transportation vendor. The report evaluates whether vendors have sufficient driver capacity to support their assigned routes and highlights potential staffing risks (under-coverage) or operational buffers (surplus coverage).

Fleet Capacity: Percentage of a vendor's vehicle capacity. This report provides a snapshot of vehicle capacity relative to active school-age routes for each transportation vendor. The report evaluates whether vendors have sufficient vehicle capacity to support their assigned routes and highlights potential capacity risks (under-capacity) or operational buffers (surplus capacity).

Fleet Vintage Average: Average age of active in-service vehicles a vendor has. This report provides a snapshot of the active school bus fleet across transportation vendors, including route coverage, in-service and spare vehicles, and average vehicle age relative to the target benchmark of 12 years or newer. Average fleet ages range from 7.8 years to 12.2 years, indicating a generally modernized fleet across the system.

Breakdown History: Rate of vehicle breakdowns normalized to service volume. This report compares vendors on vehicle breakdown performance normalized by service volume, using Breakdowns per Route Day (%) to account for differences in route scale. This metric does not by itself explain why breakdowns occurred (maintenance, age of fleet, route length, terrain, weather, operator practices, etc.). Pair with fleet age, spare ratio, and incident reason codes when available.

Accident History: Count of accidents the vendor had during the timeframe. The report tracks total accidents to date and calculates an accident rate based on total route days, allowing for fair comparisons across vendors with varying fleet sizes and service levels. This metric does not by itself explain why accidents occurred, the type of accident (bus made contact with a vehicles mirror or bus collided with another vehicle), nor does it confirm if the vendor's employee was at fault.                                                   

Violation History: Percentage of violations assessed per route day. This report provides a vendor-level view of transportation compliance performance by measuring violations relative to operational volume. It standardizes comparison across vendors by normalizing total violations against total route days, allowing leadership to identify both high-performing vendors and those requiring corrective attention.

GPS Safety Score: Vendor's GPS safety score based on driving behavior and GPS safety indicators. This report provides a comparative view of vendor driving behavior and safety performance using telematics data captured through the Geotab system. The report aggregates vehicle activity across each vendor’s active fleet for the fiscal year-to-date period and evaluates performance across key safety indicators, including acceleration, braking, cornering, seatbelt usage, and speeding behaviors. Each vendor is assigned an overall total score, which reflects performance across weighted GPS safety metrics, along with a standing that supports vendor monitoring, safety review, and operational oversight.

What's to Come!

To continue our efforts in transparency and visibility this is the first iteration of the Vendor Report Card. We will be adding additional performance metrics such as:  

  • Service Incidents
  • Inspection Data
  • On-Time Performance
  • Vendor Call Center Metrics

To provide feedback or obtain support with navigating the Vendor Report card, please contact busvendorscorecard@schools.nyc.gov.

Back to Top